Four Emotions for an Amazing First Impression:
How Jordan Peterson Wins An Argument:
Subscribe to Charisma On Command’s YouTube Account:
Arguments can be real tricky at times.
We’ve all had that moment where we have great points and feel like we’re in the right, but once we start conversing and expressing our opinions we either look like a fool or a bully.
How can we effectively win an argument or a debate?
We’re going to breakdown some of Ben Shapiro’s debate tactics and techniques so you can win an argument, even if you’re wrong.
⏰TIMESTAMPS⏰
01:11 – Technique #1: Catching Non-Arguments
01:55 – Technique #2: Getting Emotional
02:40 – Technique #3: Pushing For Specifics
04:07 – Technique #4: Ben Knows His Arguments Inside And Out
06:02 – Technique #5: The Use Of Snuck Premises
08:35 – Technique #6: Moving From The Abstract To The Concrete
09:45 – Technique #7: Emphasize The Conditions That You Would Agree With Your Opponent
——————————————————————
#BenShaprio #CharismaOnCommand #WinArguments
——————————————————————
Connect With Us Further:
Website:
Facebook:
Instagram: @CharismaOnCommand
Or if you want to see our personal stuff (regular life + playing music):
Instagram: @CharlieHoupert
Instagram: @IamBenAltman
Music :
Willing To Try By Jay Man:
ourmusicbox.com/Willing-to-try
Time Passing By by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (
Artist:
Nguồn: https://thegioibongda.com.vn
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://thegioibongda.com.vn/cong-nghe/
long story short: rightists will always win. be a rightist if you wanna win.
He uses the same tricks as creationists. The Gish Gallop
Ben is sooo dominant!!!😎
1. He fills the crowd with his supporters and interrupts his debaters 2. He doesn’t debate, he humiliates 3. When faced with facts, he gets personally defensive
Study and know thy topic. Experience and courage are two the of the best teachers.
Another thing he does is don't debate someone that can beat you and pull out at the last second e.g. kyle kulinski
Ben Shapiro vs Sam Harris. Battle of the Titans
This man Ben is a Master Debater
Man speaks fast
The reason why Ben dominates is because he's a great debater and because he's right.
6:12 you said "this isn't to pick on Ben because we all do it".
The fact that we all do it doesn't make it any better in any way.
When making a video about debates please get your logic straight
What PopPsychology nonsense is “ if you’re insulted, you’re generally winning”?
This is a really funny title to a video and for that reason I'm out.
I mean, I’d mostly argue that he tends to debate below his level, not that he’s actually super skilled in debate.
Winning or losing a debate is meaningless if you do not act doing the right thing. That is why politics talking is like planting maple tree in the desert. It will never grow.
Watch Sarah Z's analysis on Ben Shapiro and debate culture. She's a competitive debater and raises actual good points unlike this guy who is just aesthetically so.
Screw tactics. Just be honest, rational and strive to learn. That's why Ben tends to win arguments. If he tried arguing that the world was flat, these tactics wouldn't mean a thing.
That's not to say your observations aren't valid of course. I just wish people wouldn't use psycological manipulation to 'win' an argument for the sake of their ego.
I remember that a while ago I saw a video from this channel about Ben Shapiro’s weaknesses and I got salty lol
You may not be saying he’s right, but being right sure helps.
Why is he so "talented" in debates ? Because he only debates Americans
You can also sum his debate skills down to the fact hes smarter than 99.9% of the population, theres no secret skills to debates unless you're trying to debate when ur wrong and you know it. Ben has never said anything that isnt completely true, Trump 2020.
“The census bureau…” walks off
He only debates university kids. He couldn't handle BBC and became a petulant child
Biden commercial is on every video, lol…
I adore him, it’s fascinating to watch his brain work 😍
Hes not talented hes manipulative
He's not so much a debater as a bann saw – fast and loud but only good for crude cuts. In a real debate (where he couldn't ignore the question or cut off his opponent's speaking) he would be C+ or B-. In a court room, he wouldn't have a chance.
Piers was on the “how dare you” before Greta
So basically pick and chose certain words and capitalized on it like reverse psychology?
Step 1: mostly debate college undergrads
He still wouldn’t last 5 minutes in a MW2 lobby
Definitely don't agree with some of his arguments but he sure can hold a debate, smart guy.
Another thing I notice is that he will also cite sources that the left generally views as credible despite those same sources contradicting the viewpoints of the opposition. That way, they are forced not only to contend with Ben Shapiro but also the source of that information. If CNN was reporting on gang crime statistics, I could use that to ask if those black lives matter and where are their protestors?
Just speak fast and loudly so that your opponent cannot process your argument and think of a defense quick enough.
On the contrary, always ask your opponent to clarify their points so that you can spot the loophole or lack of evidence more easily.